Secession Acts of the Thirteen Confederate States
This author read through the Confederate states secession acts
in hopes of finding more clues about the state’s decisions to leave the
Union. It is not necessary to read the
provided acts, but they are here to aid the author’s critical thinking in this
matter. The link with the full succession letters is http://www.civilwar.org/…/primarys…/declarationofcauses.html
South
Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, Tennessee
South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North
Carolina, Tennessee, simply dissolved all ties to the "The Constitution of
the United States of America" and declared themselves Sovereign and
independent (Civil War Trust, 2014b). Very simple invocations of succession from
the Union were penned by these states.
The remaining 5 states made declarations that suggest the Union was not
the best alternative for these states who wished to be Sovereign so they will
be considered separately.
Alabama
Alabama mentions "state institutions" and some other
interesting data. “Be it resolved by the
people of Alabama in Convention assembled, That the people of the States of
Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Georgia,
Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky and Missouri, be
and are hereby invited to meet the people of the State of Alabama, by their
Delegates, in Convention, on the 4th day of February, A.D., 1861, at the city
of Montgomery, in the State of Alabama, for the purpose of consulting with each
other as to the most effectual mode of securing concerted and harmonious action
in whatever measures may be deemed most desirable for our common peace and
security” (Civil War Trust, 2014b, para.14).
It seems interesting that Alabama is asking the other Confederate states
for council as if one may not have
previously occurred.
Texas
Texas claimed that the Union government was not protecting them
on the front as well as stating that "the recent developments in Federal
affairs make it evident that the power of the Federal Government is sought to
be made a weapon with which to strike down the interests and property of the
people of Texas, and her sister slave-holding States, instead of permitting it
to be, as was intended, our shield against outrage and aggression" (Civil
War Trust, 2014b, para.24). Slavery
doesn't seem to be mentioned again in this 6-paragraph succession act.
Virginia
Virginia’s secession act states that "having declared that
the powers granted under said Constitution were derived from the people of the
United States and might be resumed whensoever the same should be perverted to
their injury and oppression, and the Federal Government having perverted said
powers not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression
of the Southern slave-holding States" (Civil War Trust, 2014b, para.28).
Arkansas
Arkansas stated that "Whereas, in addition to the
well-founded causes of complaint set forth by this convention, in resolutions
adopted on the 11th of March, A.D. 1861, against the sectional party now in
power in Washington City, headed by Abraham Lincoln, he has, in the face of
resolutions passed by this convention pledging the State of Arkansas to resist
to the last extremity any attempt on the part of such power to coerce any State
that had seceded from the old Union, proclaimed to the world that war should be
waged against such States until they should be compelled to submit to their
rule, and large forces to accomplish this have by this same power been called
out, and are now being marshaled to carry out this inhuman design; and to
longer submit to such rule, or remain in the old Union of the United States,
would be disgraceful and ruinous to the State of Arkansas" (Civil War
Trust, 2014b, para.33). Neither slavery
nor "institutions" are mentioned.
Missouri
Missouri states "whereas the Government of the United
States, in the possession and under the control of a sectional party, has
wantonly violated the compact originally made between said Government and the
State of Missouri, by invading with hostile armies the soil of the State,
attacking and making prisoners the militia while legally assembled under the
State laws, forcibly occupying the State capitol, and attempting through the
instrumentality of domestic traitors to usurp the State government, seizing and
destroying private property, and murdering with fiendish malignity peaceable
citizens, men, women, and children, together with other acts of atrocity,
indicating a deep-settled hostility toward the people of Missouri and their
institutions” (Civil War Trust, 2014b, para. 47).
Kentucky
The secession act of Kentucky names
many grievances that are clues to happenings in the South that led up to
decisions to leave the Union. It states "the
majority of the Legislature of Kentucky have violated their most solemn pledges
made before the election, and deceived and betrayed the people; have abandoned
the position of neutrality assumed by themselves and the people, and invited
into the State the organized armies of Lincoln; have abdicated the Government
in favor of a military despotism which they have placed around themselves, but
cannot control, and have abandoned the duty of shielding the citizen with their
protection; have thrown upon our people and the State the horrors and ravages
of war, instead of attempting to preserve the peace, and have voted men and
money for the war waged by the North for the destruction of our constitutional
rights; have violated the expressed words of the constitution by borrowing five
millions of money for the support of the war without a vote of the people; have
permitted the arrest and imprisonment of our citizens, and transferred the
constitutional prerogatives of the Executive to a military commission of
partisans; have seen the writ of habeus corpus suspended without an effort for
its preservation, and permitted our people to be driven in exile from their
homes; have subjected our property to confiscation and our persons to
confinement in the penitentiary as felons, because we may choose to take part
in a cause for civil liberty and constitutional government against a sectional
majority waging war against the people and institutions of fifteen independent
States of the old Federal Union, and have done all these things deliberately
against the warnings and vetoes of the Governor and the solemn remonstrances of
the minority in the Senate and House of Representatives (Civil War Trust,
2014b, para.51). It surely seems like
slavery is not the only reason that the Confederates succeeded from the Union. For the last piece of evidence a Robert E.
Lee letter will be presented.
Robert E. Lee's Letter to General Winfield Scott
“Transcript:
Arlington, Washington City, P.O.
20 Apr 1861
Lt. Genl Winfield Scott
Commd U.S. Army
Genl,
Since my interview with you on the 18th Inst: I have felt that I ought not longer to retain any Commission in the Army. I therefore tender my resignation which I request you will recommend for acceptance. It would have been presented at once but for the struggle it has Cost me to separate myself from a Service to which I have divoted all the best years of my life, & all the ability I possessed. During the whole of that time, more than a quarter of a century, I have experienced nothing but kindness from my superiors & the most Cordial friendships from any Comrades. To no one Genl have I been as much indebted as to yourself for kindness & Consideration & it has always been my ardent desire to merit your approbation. I shall carry with me, to the grave the most grateful recollections
of your kind Consideration, & your name & fame will always be dear to me. Save in the defense of my native state shall I ever again draw my sword. Be pleased to accept any more [illegible] wishes for “the Continuance of your happiness & prosperity & believe me
Most truly yours”
R E Lee” (Lee, 1861)
This whole
letter has been included for reader consideration. “Save in the defense of my native state shall
I ever again draw my sword” as penned in the last of this letter indicates that
Mr. Lee may have realized he’d be on the offense if he served the Union during
the Civil War.
Robert E. Lee's
Letter to General Winfield Scott
Paper. L 32.7,
W 29.3 cm
Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial, ARHO 5623
Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial, ARHO 5623
Closing Remarks
This article has presented evidence
and clues there was more to the Civil War than slavery. Approximately 650,000 Confederate and Union
soldiers and perhaps 50,000 Southern civilians lost their lives while millions
have been impoverished for generations due to the Civil War (Scruggs,
2005). In December of 1861 Charles
Dickens who despised slavery penned this in a London weekly publication, “the
Northern onslaught upon slavery is no more than a piece of specious humbug
disguised to conceal
its desire for economic control of the United States…Union means so many
millions a year lost to the South; secession means loss of the same millions to
the North. The love of money is the root of this as
many, many other evils. The quarrel between the North and South is, as it stands, solely a fiscal quarrel”
(Scruggs, 2005). Karl Marx favored the
North and wrote this for major British papers, “the war between the North and South is a tariff war. The
war, is further, not for any principle, does not
touch the question of slavery, and in fact turns on the Northern lust for power”
(Scruggs, 2005).
Abraham
Lincoln and social equality, slavery in
the South, slavery in the North, Abraham Lincoln and slavery, plans for resettlement,
the Emancipation Proclamation, “contraband camp” atrocities, the role of
private bankers in America, the Morrill Tariff Act, agents reported swarming
the South, Lincoln becomes President, Fort Sumter, July 4th message
to Congress, Salmon P, Chase, possible Masonic connections, the Secession Acts
of the Thirteen Confederate States, Robert E. Lee's
letter to General Winfield Scott, and the closing remarks have been presented
in this article. This author is not a
historian, she is just someone who wanted to better understand how brothers can
go to war with each other and documented her search. This author does NOT claim to know the "truth" do not claim to know the truth; in fact, this article will be closed with a Socrates quote and a smart ass-meme made to remind myself and others that closed minds are dangerous things and my mind needs to remain open.
References
Abraham
Lincoln. (4 July, 1861). July 4th Message to Congress. Miller Center:
University of Virginia.
Retrieved from
Civil War Trust. (2014a). Fort Sumter.
Civil War Trust. Retrieved from
Civil War Trust. (2014b). Secession Acts
of the Thirteen Confederate States. Civil
War Trust. Retrieved from
Civil War
Trust. (2014c). Judah Phillip Benjamin. Civil War Trust. Retrieved from
Ghosn, Lauren. (17 Dec, 2012). Civil War: The Battle of Fort Sumter. Retrieved
from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39OnfpVkP_0
Griffin, Des. (23 Oct, 2007). The Rothschilds & The Civil War. Rense.com.
Icke, David
Forum. (27 Dec, 2009). The Judeo-Masonic Conspiracy: How the
Jewish
Virtual Library. (2017). Judah Benjamin (1811 - 1884). Jewish Virtual
Library: a Project of
AICE. Retrieved from
Lee, Robert
E. (20 April, 1861). Letter to General Winfield Scott. Museum
Management Program.
Retrieved from
Livingston, Donald W. (Oct, 2010). Why
the War Was Not about Slavery.
Confederate Veteran. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-
d22V9dLF5NUC1mYTVFRGt6cVU/view
Morgan,
Robert. (Sept.-Oct., 1993). The 'Great Emancipator' and the Issue of
Race: Abraham Lincoln's Program of
Black Resettlement The Journal of
Historical Review,(Vol. 13, No. 5),
pages 4-25. Retrieved from
INSTITUTE FOR HISTORICAL REVIEW @
Rivero,
Michael. (2017). ALL WARS ARE BANKERS' WARS! What Really
Happened. Retrieved from
Scruggs,
Mike. (4 June, 2005). UNDERSTANDING THE CAUSES OF THE
UNCIVIL WAR: A Brief
Explanation of the Impact of the Morrill Tariff.
Tribune Papers. Retrieved
from
U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY. (11 Nov, 2010). Salmon P. Chase (1861 –
1864). Retrieved from
No comments:
Post a Comment