Consequences of Ritalin®

Consequences of Ritalin®

This article will use the critical thinking model to evaluate the possible consequences of prescribing Ritalin® to youth for ADHD and to offer ideas for solutions.  Critical thinking experts, Paul and Elder, explain that critical thinking provides a manner in which one may pose a question, procure and analyze data about the question, and then reach conclusions and solutions that are well-reasoned (Criticalthinking.org., 2011).  Paul and Elder’s Critical Thinking Model will be utilized as the format for the information that is presented (Foundation for critical thinking, 2009).  The purpose for clarifying a societal problem, associated research, the history of ADHD, the rational choice theory, an interpretation and conclusion for a proposed action plan, assumptions, a point-of-view utilization to an action plan, and the implications and consequences will be analyzed in this article.

Purpose for Clarifying a Societal Problem

The objective of this section is to analyze the societal problem of the prevalence in which Ritalin® (methylphenidate, MPH) is prescribed to America’s youth for ADHD.  Children’s diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) skyrocketed approximately 41% from 2003 to 2011 to reach a total of 6.4 million children according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Story, et.al., 2016).  The CDC also claims that the most commonly used neurobehavioral diagnosis is ADHD with 7-years-old as the average age at the time of diagnosis and twice as many boys in comparison to girls (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  Marco, et.al. (2011) explain that concern is surfacing about the long-term safety of the extensive number of adolescents and children who are given MPH, a psychostimulant, for ADHD.  Basically, the purpose of the author’s thinking is to evaluate the possible causes for this situation.  Next the issues that raised the need for this objective will be presented.

Associated Research

The problem with this issue is that research indicates that there are side effects associated with Ritalin® as will be explored in this section.  Calipari, et.al. (2014) report that the action mechanism of MPH is similar to that of cocaine.  Bottelier, et.al. (2014) further explain that a -50% reduction in dopamine transport density is associated with MPH “treatment” of young rats’ striatum with no apparent affects to adult rats to demonstrate that the adverse effects of Ritalin® are age dependent.

“Adolescent exposure to MPH seems to provoke persistent neurobehavioral consequences: long-term modulation of self-control abilities, decreased sensitivity to natural and drug reward, enhanced stress-induced emotionality, together with an enhanced cortical control over sub-cortical dopamine systems and an enduring up-

regulation of Htr7 gene expression within the nucleus accumbens”(Marco, et.al., 2011, para.1).

Helle-Valle, et.al. (2015) state that other studies as well as their own question the validity of the ADHD diagnosis tool and the usual treatment of ADHD symptoms.  The associated research is a small sample of available data that has been gathered concerning the dilemma of children taking Ritalin®.  Information concerned with history of ADHD will be discussed next.

History of ADHD

Facts and data about the development of ADHD and its relation to historical trends will be discussed in this section.  According to Holland and Higuera (2015) Sir George Still, a British pediatrician, first mentioned ADHD in 1902 when he noted “an abnormal defect of moral control in children” who were intelligent yet unable to control their behavior (para.2).  In 1936 Benzedrine was approved as a medicine by the FDA and the next year Dr. Charles Bradley noticed that school performance and behavior improved among his young patients when given the psychostimulant (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  Bradley’s findings were ignored until many years later when researchers and doctors recognized the “benefits” of giving children pharmaceutical speed (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  It seems that this diagnosis or its treatment was not embraced by the scientific community at its onset.  The next paragraph will present this author’s interpretation of historical trends related to the DSM and the skyrocketing cases of ADHD.

It appears that the DSM’s acceptance of early work in ADHD led to this diagnosis flourishing in America.  The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was first issued in 1952 to list mental disorders that were recognized along with causes and treatments for conditions, and it did not include any disorders related to ADHD which may be why the disease was basically unknown at this time (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  The year 1955 saw Ritalin® approved as a medicine by the FDA, and in 1968 the second DSM was published with hyperkinetic impulse disorder, an early name for ADHD, included in it (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  In 1980 the release of the DSM-III saw the original name changed to attention deficit disorder (ADD) to include those do not possess all of the symptoms of the original diagnosis and attention deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) to create two subtypes of the disorder (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  The revised DSM-III that was released in 1987 removed the subtypes of ADHD, and in 2000 the DSM-IV was published with three subtypes of ADHD that are used today (Holland and Higuera, 2015).  Holland and Higuera (2015) report that a significant increase in ADHD diagnosis began in the 1990’s; this author feels that this climb is related to DSM’s classification of ADHD.  Please recall that ADHD cases increased around 41% from 2003 to 2011 to reflect a large increase in cases (Story, et.al., 2016).  The documentary Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging (2012) explains that the DSM has codes in it that are used by doctors to collect money from insurance companies so that any disorder that is not listed in the DSM is not covered by insurance.  Observations seem to reflect that it is possible that the societal problem of ADHD and MPH may be related to the DSM classifying ADHD with an insurance code.  Other trends in psychology are related because psychopharmacology appears to be taking over the field of psychology since the development of psychotropic medication and the establishment of the DSM.  Concepts related to a social theory may explain the manner in which ADHD has evolved into a societal problem will be discussed next.

Rational Choice Theory

An analysis of the rational choice theory with supporting evidence for the author’s choice of this theory to explain the societal problem will be presented now.  According to the rational choice theory motivation for wants and goals drives individuals so that “the relationship between preferences and constraints can be seen in the purely technical terms of the relationship of a means to an end” (Scott, 2000. p.3).  That is to say that choices are made by individuals to will help them attain their goals and individuals are “motivated by the pursuit of a 'profitable' balance of rewards over costs” (Scott, 2000, p.5).  The rational choice theory points out that people gauge their relationships by what they can profit from them.  Next, what may be profited from putting children on pharmaceutical speed with lasting adverse effects will be analyzed.

It’s possible that lobbying and big pharma rewards are providing profit to those who prescribe Ritalin® to America’s future generation of citizens.  A system of rewards used by pharmaceutical companies to convince doctors to prescribe their medications and double agent FDA members who work for big pharma to help get drugs to market are discussed in the documentary Making a Killing (Of Interest, 2012).  Scholarly reviewed Senior (2013) states that the biosimilar or generic war has demonstrated the extent to which healthcare policy and legislation is influenced by lobbying.  In 2012 there was $234 million dollars released for lobbying by the US drug industry as the biggest contributors to this practice (Senior, 2013).  Another scholarly reviewed author professes that alternative medicines are seen as witchcraft by some in the scientific community who wish to close out the alternative medicine section of the NIH (Stone, 1997).  Reardon (2014) reveals that the NIH budget may be even more impacted by lobbying than the revealed estimates indicate in another scholarly reviewed article.  Is there any chance that the people who do not wish alternative medicines to be tested are being rewarded in some fashion?  The manner in which these principles relate to the proposed action plan will be presented next.

Interpretation and Conclusion for a Proposed Action Plan

This author’s interpretation of the data presented so far infers that a proposed action plan should involve changes.  The NIMH Collaborative Multisite Multimodal Treatment Study of Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA) demonstrated that for 6 -8 years a transient raise in emotional disorders after treatment with Ritalin® (Bottelier,et.al., 2014).  Bottelier, et.al. (2014) inform us that behavioral therapy is associated with 4.3% of depressed and anxious children while Ritalin® therapy is associated with 19.1% children with anxiety and depression to indicate that behavioral therapy alone may be more advantageous for ADHD than psychostimulants.  Helle-Valle, et.al. (2015) suggest that more awareness is needed about the need to be creative and restlessness that is associated with childhood, and that better cooperation between the local community and institutions is a necessity.  It is also suggested that adults are co-creators of children’s problems so that adults should share in the responsibility to resolve said problems (Helle-Valle, et.al., 2015).  These principles are related to the proposed action plan because the plan involves changes.  Next assumptions will be discussed.

Assumptions

Assumptions are made by the author in the line of reasoning presented.  The author’s line of reasoning assumes that all children who are diagnosed with ADHD can be better helped with alternative methods than Ritalin®, it is also assumed that teachers and doctors who recommend pharmaceutical speed that affects the developing brain are aware of what they are telling trusting parents to give their children.  This author knows for a fact that she gave her own child MPH because his kindergarten teacher asked her to and his doctor gave it to him in a 10-minute office visit when he was 6-years-old; in fact, at that time this author assumed that teachers and doctors had her child’s best interest in heart.  Nevertheless, Fiore (2014) explains that financial relationships between researchers and investors result in biased research.  In fact, this school source states that “conflicts of interest pose a threat to scientific integrity by introducing forms of bias that affect the enterprise of science itself” (Fiore, 2014, para.46).  It seems like many parents must take it for granted that their doctors and teachers know what’s best for the children so that they do not research products for themselves.  This author’s point-of-view will be utilized to formulate an action plan next.

Point-of-View Utilization to an Action Plan

There are a few alternatives for ADHD treatment that may not be discussed when parents take their children to doctors.  Forgoing food coloring and avoiding potential allergens with diet management is one choice to aid with hyperactive symptoms (Story, et.al., 2016).  Some studies suggest that EEG training may help with ADHD symptoms while other studies state that yoga helps and still other studies recommend tai-chi (Story, et.al., 2016).  Green space and regular exposure to outdoors was determined to help in a 2011 study (Story, et.al., 2016).  According to the American Academy of Pediatrics the first step in treating ADHD in young children should be behavioral therapy (Story, et.al., 2016).  Parental therapy that equips parents to deal with their children and help them progress is another viable solution (Story, et.al., 2016).  These alternative treatments to psychopharmacology doesn’t take jobs away from psychologists; instead, it shifts the responsibility of helping ADHD children to psychologists from drug companies.  Next an action plan will be presented.

The action plan involves restricting lobbying and doctoral awards associated with big pharma.  Steinbrook (2008) reports that pharmacy companies are allowed to give tens of millions of dollars in soft-core donations to Congress and federal agents and this author believes that this as well as all lobbying by drug companies should be made illegal in order to formulate an action plan.  Bodenheimer (2000) states that “the evidence is persuasive that investigators with financial ties to companies whose products they are studying are much more likely to publish studies favorable to those products” so that it would be better if these ties were severed (para.60).  Doctors and teachers should be instructed to tell parents to take children to psychologists who are instructed to help children to resolve hyperactive and in attentive issues in lieu of doping them up.  It’s a simple plan; however, this author sadly notes that it will not be put into action because it affects the money flow of big pharma.  In fact, this plan would so many who pay and pay into the medical industry to never be healed.  The implications and consequences of ignoring this plan will be discussed next.

Implications and Consequences

The implications and consequences involved with prescribing pharmaceutical speed to children with ADHD symptoms are varied.  Americans are raising children who think that it’s alright to take dangerous drugs in lieu of learning to deal with a difficult youth so that they grow up thinking that taking mind altering drugs to deal with your problems is okay.  Considering the research provided in this article and even more available research indicates that children’s brains are being interfered with during development when they are given Ritalin® it seems best for the future of America to find a better way to deal with this societal dilemma.  In private research with my son who took MPH from 6 to 14-years I learned that he exhibits all of the visible symptoms listed from the Marco, et.al. (2011) study.  It seems like enough evidence from University approved sources have been provided to implicate that this author’s action plan is a valid one.

The purpose for clarifying a societal problem, associated research, the history of ADHD, the rational choice theory, an interpretation and conclusion for a proposed action plan, assumptions, a point-of-view utilization to an action plan, and the implications and consequences have been discussed in this article.  This author hopes that society will realize that the “cure” for ADHD is no more than a mask that sets children up for a hard time later on in life.

I used what i learned in college and life to make some blogs when my school career ended.  I did get to me bachelor's in psychology, but was blocked by a 3,000$ fee to get my degree.  I did make a 100 on this ritalin paper.  I learned that the school's and whole system is biased.

Part 1: Big Pharma Controls the Medical Industry @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/03/part-1-big-pharma-controls-medical.html 

Part 2: Beating the Cancer IndustryScam @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/03/part-2-beating-cancer-industry-scam.html

Part 3: Home Remedies to the Rescue @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/04/part-3-home-remedies-to-rescue.html

Part 4: Alternative Depression Treatments @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/04/part-4-alternative-depression-treatments.html

This author first learned of colloidal silver from a holistic doctor’s video at the time of the ebola scare, and the doctor showed some books that told of miraculous cures with colloidal silver that have been “squashed” in the medical industry because it kills “600 pathogens”.  Dr. Sirian explained that colloidal silver will kill ebola so I pursued incorporating it into my life.  As a single mom, I could not pay the doctor for his small bottles, but I did find out how to make it and ordered my silver rods for 20$.  After 3 years of experimenting and researching I do believe that it is a miracle drug that could change and save lives so I will make this blog. 

Part 5 : Take Charge with Colloidal Silver @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/05/part-5-take-charge-with-colloidal-silver.html

Sometimes a dirty energy field will cause problems that psychiatry and psychology miss for which i have some blogs about keeping the energy field clean.

Victims of Sexual Abuse May Need a Goode Cleanse @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/07/victims-of-sexual-abuse-need-goode.html

When Children are Afraid to be Alone with a Bit on Protecting Your Childe @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/06/when-children-are-afraid-to-be-alone.html

Shadows and Shadow People with a Protection Tip @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/06/shadows-and-shadow-people-with.html

tips on cleansing @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/06/tips-on-cleansing.html

Signs of Astral Attack and a Goode Light Cleasnsing Method @ http://citedinfo.blogspot.com/2017/06/signs-of-astral-attack-and-goode-light.html

Thank You for reading my blog :)

http://magickalgraphics.com/Graphics/Occult/BlessedBe/blessed68.gif

References

Bottelier, M. A., Schouw, M. J., Klomp, A., Tamminga, H. H., Schrantee, A. M., Bouziane, C.,

& ... Reneman, L. (2014). The effects of Psychotropic drugs On Developing

brain (ePOD) study: Methods and design. BMC Psychiatry,

14doi:10.1186/1471-244X-14-48

http://web.b.ebscohost.com.library.capella.edu/.../pdfvie...

Calipari, E. S., Ferris, M. J., Melchior, J. R., Bermejo, K., Salahpour, A., Roberts, D. S., &

 Jones, S. R. (2014). Methylphenidate and cocaine self-administration produce

distinct dopamine terminal alterations. Addiction Biology, 19(2), 145-155.doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00456.x

Criticalthinking.org. (2011). Critical thinking: Where to begin. Retrieved from

 http://www.criticalthinking.org/starting/index.cfm

Fiore, Robin N.. Ph.D. (15 Dec,2014). Conflicts of Interest in Research Involving Human

Subjects. CITI Program. Retrieved from

https://www.citiprogram.org/members/index.cfm?pageID=125

Foundation for Critical Thinking. (2009). Critical thinking model. Retrieved from

 http://www.criticalthinking.org/index.cfm 

Helle-Valle, A., Binder, P., & Stige, B. (2015). Do we understand children's restlessness?

            constructing ecologically valid understandings through reflexive cooperation.

 International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 10

 doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.3402/qhw.v10.29292.

Holland, KImberly and Higuera, Valencia. (26 February, 2015). The History of ADHD: A

                           Timeline. Health Line. Retrieved from

                            http://www.healthline.com/health/adhd/history#Overview1 

Marco, Eva M; Adriani, Walter; Ruocco, Lucia A; Canese, Rossella; Sadile, Adolfo G; and

 Laviola, Giovanni. (Aug, 2011). Neurobehavioral adaptations to methylphenidate: The

 issue of early adolescent exposure. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. Volume 35,

 Issue 8, Pages 1722–1739. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.011. Retrieved from

 http://www.sciencedirect.com.library.capella.edu/.../S014...

Of Interest. (23 Dec, 2012). Making a Killing: The Untold Story of Psychotropic Drugging – Full

 Movie (Documentary). Of Interest. Retrieved from

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rk-ryvdWPgw

Reardon, S. (2014). Lobbying sways NIH grants. Nature, 515(7525), 19. Retrieved from

 http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/.../162775..

Scott, John. (2000). Rational Choice Theory. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of

  The Present. Sage Publications. Pages 1 -15. Retrieved from

 http://www.soc.iastate.edu/sapp/soc401rationalchoice.pdf

Senior, M. (2013). Spreading biotech dollars around washington. Nature Biotechnology, 31(8),

 673-5. doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1038/nbt.2651

Steinbrook, R., M.D. (2008). Campaign contributions, lobbying, and the U.S. health sector – an

 update. The New England Journal of Medicine, 359(13), 1313-5.

doi:http://dx.doi.org.library.capella.edu/10.1056/NEJMp0807073

Stone, R. (1997). Lobbying blitz attacks alternative medicine. Science, 277(5323), 169.

 Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/.../213579...

Story, Colleen M.; Gotter, Ana; and Goldman, Rena. (31 August, 2016). 6 Natural Remedies for

 ADHD. Health Line. Retrieved from

 http://www.healthline.com/health/adhd/natural-remedies…